One would think that I am trying to mingle a very serious issue of ‘freedom’ with trivial things like spit and nuisance. But then this what freedom means to most, not only in
Not going into that argument, what I intend to make clear is that contrary to the general opinion, Islam is not against debate and discussions. But that does not mean that one starts speaking ill against anyone or any philosophy because he thinks it to be wrong.
Taking examples and generalizing it is not going to help anyone. The differences need to be resolved amicably. Some Mr. Ibrahim was responsible for a blast, Muslims are traitors and terrorists. Modi was responsible for
We should encourage mutual understanding and talk of commonalities and not of differences. The inherent psychology of superiority needs to be tackled properly. Otherwise the situation has thus become that Mr. Rushdie becomes the State Guest of a country, after he tries to malign Islam and presents it in the wrong light. The country, which generally takes strong objections to anyone going against the system; speaking against the Government or office bearers, ignored the fact that the same Rushdie had once called Margaret Thatcher’s (once PM of UK) policy as her “fucking policy”.
A so called feminist author (or rather a hilarious feminist) Tasleema Nasreen regards herself as “secular”. Intellectuals and academicians may not like everything she says or writes, but would still support her for she has overnight become the champion of liberty, feminism, democracy, and secularism. Intellectuals and pseudo-intellectuals of
In any case, let me make one thing very clear that I am in no ways on the side of Mr. Hussain, as Islam strictly prohibits painting of Human beings. Painting women, that too nude, is a double sin. And the the Holy Quran says “Do not defame others gods, lest in ignorance they speak ill of Allah”.
The Editor, and if published, the general reader will think that either I m crazy or that I am in a epileptic fit, for I began with nuisance and spits, and now I am speaking of Quran (in a completely different pond). I believe but that so far as one is faithful and honest to himself, a writer has full freedom to express himself and write what he feels. But on the pretext one does not get the freedom to say and write things, which have nothing to do with reality, but simply because his whims says so. As Dr. Johnson said, “the danger of such unbounded liberty and the danger of bounding it have produced a problem in the science of Government, which human understanding seems hitherto unable to solve…..if every sceptick in theology may teach his follies there can be no religion”.
I would end quoting Abraham Lincoln and Rabindranath Tagore, one former President of America and the other a poet; two different persons, but ardent champions of liberty, humanity and brotherhood.
“Freedom from the fear is the freedom.
………..Freedom from the insult
Of dwelling in a puppet’s world….”
1 comment:
right....freedom must bve restrained....unrestrained freedom would lead to anarchy
Post a Comment